Let's hope this dosen't go to 4! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

This movie was horrible! First of all, whats with the blood in the movie?! Ugh, this movie sucks even if I watch Barney, I still would be entertained by THAT! PLease,no more Jurassics or I'm gonna teach Hollywood a lesson!

I would laugh, if i wasn't so annoyed - Jurassic Park III Reviews

The third installment in the monumental series of dinosaur movies, is even more ridiculous than I would have thought possible, and thats saying somthing. With a pathetic attempt at rallying support by including the original hero in the script. This god awfull piece of garbage never ceases to amaze me at what directors will drag onto our screens. From start to go the storyline is weak, Dr Grant returning to the island as a tour guide under false pretenses, lured by a couple of frightened parents into trecking around the whole island searchinf for a young boy who has been missing for over a month. Event after event, the mindless hunters, created for no other purpose that to be picked of by large predators. They eventually end up stranded and alone (Sounds familier) on a dinosaur filled island with little more than a yellow cellulah phone in the stomach of a large spineosaurus, as a lifeline to the outside world. The visuals are laughable, the acting pathetic, however these are 2nd only to the momumentally pathetic story and direction. Communications with hungry dinosaurs who think and are so familier with biology that they snap spinal columns of there prey instead of mauling them as you would have expected. Having Survived dinosaur attacks for many weeks the son is eventually recovered and all the main charecters survive, leaving a happy magical ending, with the ability to lead of more and more pathetically stupid sequals. Yet, another ridiculous piece of tripe. Do not waste time with this garbage, rent somthing else.

Jurassic park iii - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Without Steven directing this third installment, it just sucks! The directing was so poor, the story line was weak, the acting and the visuals are still good and well. I thought that this Jurassic would do better than the first two Jurassic's, but it didn't! It's one of those sequels that shouldn't have been made!

What the hell is this! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

This is the worst of the worst. This movie has no sensability what so ever. It was a dissapointment to fans and other people alike. Thank the screenwriter and the director for this mess. To the people mentioned above thaks a lot *****s

Disgraces the name of the series - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Jurassic Park was a good movie, but its sequels get worse and worse every time. The first one, which is definitly the best of the series, is also the only one you can officially call "a movie based on a Michael Crichton book". The second one was just a story the makers came up with, and they kept the title "The Lost World" because that was the sequel to Crichton's first novel. The third one, which I am sadly taking the time to review, was not the title of one of Crichton's books. And I seriously doubt that Michael Crichton, or any writer good enough to become professional, would write a book this bad. The first two had goodries, so what new director Joe Johnston did was mix parts of them together in the hopes that the results could compare to what a man like Steven Spielberg can do to a film. Instead, he was left with an unoriginal movie with no sense. In the third, a family asks Dr. Allan Grant to help him rescue their son, who is stuck on Isla Sorna. On the way, dinosaurs attack them. And that's it.It's an unbeievably weak story period, let alone compared to the other two. And all the new features that might have improved the movie if it had not been in the seres just make it worse. The main dinosaur in JP3 is not the one that ultimatly symbolizes Jurassic Park, Tyrannosauraus Rex. Instead, it is Spinosauraus. Though the Spinosauraus is big, mean, and fast, it just does not deliver the same sort of fear that T-Rex does in the first two. Also, the velociraptors have changed their shape to what velociraptors probably looked like in real life, instead of what they did in the first two. This may please scientists, but no one who enjoyed the first two will like it. There is a lot of violence in this movie, but it is scattered in peces over the movie. There is no long scene of terror, like the classic kitchen scene in the first one. They're all quick, short, and non-capturing scenes. Sure, lots of people die just for the sake of having that in a movie, but it never gets to your feelings, because they had such a short part in the movie that you never really got to know them. This movie is much too short and meaningless to make you get into it, so forget about it being a worthy follow-up. No one who was alive when the first movie was made (1993) should like this movie, and very few people who weren't alive will like it anyway. Definetly one of the worst movies of all time: arguably the worse.

One of the best movies!! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Good acting, good story (they had a reason to be on the island), and good visuals. I would recommend you to go see this movie.

Awesome - Jurassic Park III Reviews

I don't know why some of the other reviewers hate it so much, I thought it was an aweomse, suspense-filled, action packed sequal.

Aaaaawwwwssssooooommmmeeee!!!!!! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

this movie is the greatest dinasour movie ever, you wont believe the graphics, and the story, out of all of them, this one has the best story, you will love the 3 one

Iii doesn't cut it - Jurassic Park III Reviews

OK, while The Lost World may not have been as good as the original JP, it was eons better than this popcorn-shoot. Funny it's part three, and has three major flaws: 1. The raptors. While it's nice to make them smarter, their appearance is unacceptable. No raptor from the previous film was bluish-purple. And while we may never know what their skin did look like, the film makers should keep the visuals consistent! And as for the feather-top heads...well, if they were creatures that combined reptillian and bird-like features, those down feathers would have been shed by adolecence. And did I not see a relatively "normal" looking raptor briefly amongst the horde of newbies? Make up your mind. 2. The pteradons. Where the flew free at the end of Lost World, we suddenly find them trapped in an over-sized bird cage--something not seen in either Lost World book or movie. Granted the scenes worked, the concept of the cage on a free-roaming island doesn't quite work. Neither does a fenceless island having a large fence running near the edge of it. 3. The biggest flaw of all: the spinosaurus. Where was this dino in the previous movie? Was was it in the books? This is the same island as the one in The Lost World, right? Granted they may not have covered the whole island in JP2, if this guy is King of the Dinos here, wouldn't evidence of him be in the last one? Exploitation at it's worst. So, while I will give this film points for some intense action, some great looking creatures (raptors not included--just for the poor continuity), the acting here is banal, supported only by Sam Neill and Laura Dern's brief appearance, and the direction is like watching a computer nerd trying to imitate Spielberg. Not for fans.

Jurassic park 3 is better than jurassic park 2... - Jurassic Park III Reviews

...however it still is not as good as the original. The story and plot was not made as well as the first Jurassic movie although the new graphics were much more life-like thanks to newer technology. For the acting, however, I believe the actors preformed just as good as the original and they definately outshined the sad preformance of the actors in the second-sequel (there only seemed to be about 3 good actors in Jurassic Park 2 but not enough to save the film). If you do like this film you should watch the original Jurassic Park (it is the best out of the trilogy).

Wow - Jurassic Park III Reviews

this movie was great. better than the other two.the dinosaurs were better than ever. sam neil looks great in this movie. you should make a fourth one.

Jurasic park3 - Jurassic Park III Reviews

This movie rocks! it has dinos of all scientists and crased planes and it is great! i would give it an A+ just dont let kids under 12 see it or they just might freak out!

More of an adventure film - Jurassic Park III Reviews

This movie lacks the great story and thrills of the first film and tends to be a chase movie where the characters run away from the creatures. The film tends to exhaust itself with scenes where the same repetitive things occuring. The excitement dies out later on when the film seems to go on for infinite time. The movie has a story which is ok but leaves open for another sequel. Recommend renting instead of buying.

It's too much. no more. - Jurassic Park III Reviews

I didn't really enjoy this movie. I thought it was a real half-baked invention of the other two. I do think that this story line was a little bit better than the previous one, but this was totally not needed.

Worse than the second - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Brace yourselves a journey different from the first one. This movie was horrible. The first one was great, the second one was worse and this just didn't interest me at all. This story was bad because it was just about saving a kid and the kid never could have survived. The acting was horrific. Nobody could act in this film. The direction was different and nt good either. The visuals were the only thing that was good in this movie. Overall it was horrible, terrible whatever you want to call it. the story of jurrasic park is unrealistic but ome of this stuff was just stupid.

What the hell were they thinking? - Jurassic Park III Reviews

The movie is so bad that i need to barf after i saw it. It a disgrace to the name jusrassic park, and it does not even mention the other movies in the series. Stay away

Scary area - Jurassic Park III Reviews

it is a scary story where the creatures are sometimes surpising smarter then you think. and some part the creature know what to do be for you do.

Not fit for the jurassic park name - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Now, I'm not going to say I didn't like this movie because it was bad, after all, I've enjoyed plenty of bad movies in my time, but what really seems unappealing to me about this film was that it simply didn't work, all the while milking a great first movie and an okay second. Jurassic Park III was just disappointing to me, as visually it took a completely different direction than the first two. I understand there was a different director, but when working within a series you should try to stick to what's working, not inject your own "good" ideas. From the moment the film began, with flashy a flashy title and obnoxious "Isla Sorna" quickly slashed by "RESTRICTED", I could tell that the actual style and beauty of the Spielberg-directed films beforehand had been abandoned in favor of a flashy, pull-in-the-12-year-old-boys action/monster film. And the film continued in this vein from there on. The acting was mediocre at best, the directing seemed rushed and scrambled, and the visual effects, while well done, were not nearly enough to carry an entire film, as CGI effects could back closer to their introduction 10 years beforehand. Overall, the film was a great disappointment, and I personally wouldn't count it as part of the Jurassic Park series in my home collection.

This movie sucked - Jurassic Park III Reviews

this was the worst movie i've ever seen. i hope no other jurassic park movies come out. i liked the first one and the second was ok but this destroied the series. i'd rather kill my self twice before i see this movie agian

What's wrong with this franchise? - Jurassic Park III Reviews

The first JP was a great yarn about the effects of man versus nature. It had a potent amount of action, humor, FX and (somewhat) believable characters. The inevitable sequel was quite a bit more hollow with the FX shots simply tweaked up a little. Then there was this one. Without really adding anything new to the series, we're left to hope that this franchise stays extinct. Not a bad movie...but certainly not a good one either.

Very very very very good!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

I think this movie was very good i think this is one of the best ones of jurassic parks because they add new characters and different stuff then the 1st and 2nd Jurassic Park.

This is my 3rd review this year i'm an expert!!!! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

I don't why people thought the first three reviews were helpful. The acting was good. The story was good too. They say the 2nd one was good but to me it was one the worst films I have ever seen. I liked the 1st one the best then the 3rd and I didn't even like the 2nd one. Overall it's a pretty good movie with great graphics.

Best one since the original - Jurassic Park III Reviews

WOW Jurassic Park 3 was the best jurassic park movie since the original!!!!!!! It has everything!!! The story was really great, the visuals were the best yet and you couldn't ask for better actors! I think they are making a Jurassic Park 4 so I can't wait until that!!!!!

Okay, worst of the three - Jurassic Park III Reviews

This movie was alright, it stunk alot because of the beginning, they let their 12 year old son go sailing on an island with dinosaurs which was also probably restricted. And after all that time studying dinosaurs they just now discover another dinosaur that was not half as menacing as the T-Rex. And one more thing I didnt understand was with the communicating *****, that the movie kinda stupid. Otherwise it was alright, I wouldnt want to see it again though.

One of the worst movies ever made. - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Really disappointing follow up really adds nothing to the series other than a poor excuse of a movie that rips off the first two movies other than stand on it?s own two feet. The acting is bad as well as the directing, and there is no story to be told. Watch only if nothing is on.

Best movie ever!!! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Jurassic park 3 is the best movie ever!!! Since I was three I loved dinosaurs and every night my dad would me read dinosaur books. Johnston did'nt do as good as Speilberg could have done but it still made it to my favorite movie.

Makes the american godzilla remake look like a mas - Jurassic Park III Reviews

If you can remember the Godzilla remake by Roland Emmerich & Dean Devlin, then you must have had nightmares on how bad it was. The bad rip offs of much better movies and the extremely corny, sentimental dialogs only written to please slow adults and small children. This movie was so bad in fact that you don?t need Mike and the Bots from MST3K to make fun of it, the movie writes it?s own punch lines for you to say. Any movie with Matthew Broderick as an action hero should be an indication on how bad it is, and with a monster that looks more like a raptor than the Godzilla who all know and love, the recipe for failure is pretty big. Which brings us to this film which is not only one of the worse sequels ever made but probably one of the worse films made period. Sam Neil is a great actor, but the film itself is so bad that it makes him look like a buffoon. The way they tried to make him into an Indiana Jones wannabe is not only sad but also flat out laughable. He comes more a cross more like Chevy Chase than Harrison Ford. The casts of supporting characters fares no better and in some respect fare much worse. William H Macy is probably one of the best actors around but you really can?t tell that by his performance here which is beyond annoying. Tea Leoni is flat out annoying as well as his wife, a woman whose scream could chip years old paint. I think the only actor who fares decent here is the late Michael Jeter, who is barely in the film at all. His performance is funny, and could have benefited the film a lot more if he was in it more. The special effects are not as impressive as they were in the last two films, and the direction is very disjointed compared to what Spielberg was able to do with the first two movies. Spielberg was able to create tension and create action scenes that can blow your socks off. Joe Johnson, who steps in for Mr. Spielberg this time around not only abandons what his predecessor had done before but completely disregards any logic that the other movies had. The first two films where about science and the dangers of tampering with nature. This film is just a strait forward monster movie that does not even have a plot to go by. The characters here are nothing more than Dinosaur food and the setting itself does not even look like the island of the last movie. There are even certain things in this film that even contradicts some of the information that was giving in the last two films, and it tries to bring in a dinosaur that was not even created in those movies. Its really sad to see Joe Johnson demean himself with a bad film like this, because he has done much better work in the past. The Rocketter is a prime example of a good comic book movie, and October Sky is a well-paced family drama that should have had more notice in the theater. With this movie, Joe looks like he just wanted to cash a pay check, and judging by the way every thing in the film was done, it looks like every one involved were doing the same thing. Which is sad in a sense because it?s the fans that pay for it in the long run.

Try to contain the vomit - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Wow, this movie is terrible. Not only does it trash the reputation of an otherwise fantastic actor, William H. Macy, but it perpetuates the crappiness of a film series that should've stopped at number one. STORY: Absurd. They go to the island to find a lost boy. Dinosaurs, of course, attack, because that's what they do. Then, amazingly, the humans figure out how to TALK to the dinosaurs, find their sensitive spots, and the now very colorful raptors don't kill them after all. Thrilling if you enjoy paper-thin plot lines and over-the-top dialogue. ACTING: As I noted before, William H. Macy pretended that the movie wasn't a complete waste of time, and it didn't work. He looks as bored as the audience feels. Sam Neill revises his role as the wisened, bitter Dr. Grant ... and he really seems bitter ... bitter to be in this movie. But wisened with his paycheck. DIRECTION: It's obvious why Spielberg distanced himself from this project, and some hack filled his place. There is no script. None whatsoever. The producers should've asked a thirteen-year-old boy to write a draft because that would undoubtedly be more worthwhile. VISUALS: There's a new dinosaur. And he looks stupid. And the raptors are suddenly more colorful and talk to each other ... they TALK, and that's a major plot point. Wow. I can taste the acidity of my puke just thinking about it. OVERALL: Don't watch it. That's my overall. Just don't even bother. Don't even rent it. Don't even burn it in a huge Catholic bonfire. It's not worth thinking about, or even this review.

Always the original.... - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Jurassic Park was the movie of dinosaurs. It has also been my favorite movie for 10 years. The sequel to it wasn't as good, and neither is its other sequel, JPIII. JPIII is the movie of the series that doesn't base itself on a book. Therefore, it leads to a good story, good acting, and a good direction. That's it. GOOD! Not great. The brilliant part of the movie the damn special effects. They truly kick ass and it's unbelievable. I still suggest that you people out there buy it.