Gayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy - Jurassic Park III Reviews

OMFG this movie was so gay it was so much shorter than the last 2..the first one was perfect,the second one was.. a little exccesive but still very good but the third was so gay,so short didnt even look like the second,and overall SUCKS

What happened? - Jurassic Park III Reviews

What happened between the first two movies and this movie. The first two films had good stories, good acting, and and amazing directing, but Jurassic Park /// doesn't have any of that. This movie just used the same story as the first two, so it isn't original. And what's up with the Spinosaurus, having it in the movie is one thing, but having it kill the T-rex really killed the whole movie. Jurassic Park /// is an okay movie, but doesn't live up to the original films.

A disaster - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Jurassic Park 3 is a totally unneeded sequel to the first, a classic, and in the second case, a solid, film. Though it does feature some impressive CG dinsosaurs that were not included in the first two films, like a Spinosaurus, it falls flat in almost all facets. I was a big fan of dinousaurs as a youngster, so I was excited to see the film, even if the preview made it seem a little different from the first two. For example, all of the action takes place in the daytime. However, that and everything else turned out wrong. What are Tea Leoni and William H. Macy doing in a Jurassic Park movie? Jurassic Park should never resemble Deep Impact in any way, but boy does it ever! Their performance, which will never come off as action-film worthy, highlights an atrocious attempt at family drama that is the premise of the movie. Add to that the unlikely premise of the film in general, that the scientists simply did not apply the rules to one of their dino-islands, and you have a plot in a terminally vegetative state. To trump all of the above disappointments, the ending of this film will suprise you immensely, and not in a good way, either.

Best movie ever!!! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

JP3 was the best movie ever made and come to think of it? why do most people think the movie was poor? because it was the best movie ever... Ski Yeah Masterjedi jasen Deputy Student

Third time's a------stupid piece of crap - Jurassic Park III Reviews

The "Jurassic Park" trilogy went awry somewhere after the first. Cause "Lost World" is crappy (with it's lamely climactic gymnastic trick). And this movie is disappointing as well. The story probably could've been better. And I expected more entertainment. Clocking in at 90 minutes, with quite a few action sequences, this movie sure isn't boring - but it sure isn't outstanding, either. And what was with the everyone-survives happily ever after? That was crap. I got nothing out of this movie. It was better than "Planet of the Apes" but it's still just cheap entertainment.

Why did they bother? - Jurassic Park III Reviews

The Lost World was a mistake, not to mention a THIRD movie. They need to give it up and stop making crappy sequels of Jurassic Park. For some reason, the raptors being enhanced caused them to turn purplish and grow feathers from their head. Also, the pteranodon had binocular vision and teeth, both of which are not true of the creature. If I wasn't so knowledgeable of dinosaurs I probably wouldn't have noticed. All in all, a disappointing movie.

Jp3 - Jurassic Park III Reviews

What a movie...now I know it did fairly well and grossed itself to the 65th best movie of all time but I really think they need Speilberg to get this movie up with it's prequels. Anyway it was good

Yuck - Jurassic Park III Reviews

This is the worst movie i have ever seen, its like watching #1 and #2 all over again. It was a waste of my time and money.

Just so damn worthless - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Jurassic Park has always been a movie about dinosaurs. THe bad thing? Always just the same happens. THe characters just got stranded in an island worth of dinosaurs and then stupid disasters happen. You know, it always come to disasters and yes of course the main characters survive. MOreover good dinosaurs always appear in the end. Is there any other stories you could make besides this stupid and truly used up concept?

Could've been better! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

I like Jurassic Park movies and I loved this one two, but I wish it could've lived up to its predecessers. It was a good movie but could've had been payed more work on top of it.

Too short - Jurassic Park III Reviews

This movie is not even close to being as good as the first two. It's too short, the bodycount is too low, and the spinosaurus looks fake. The only good part is when the T-Rex and the spinosaurus fight. And they completely killed the way people view the Tyrannosaurus by having it lose to the stupid looking main dinosaur. I also liked the raptors.

Happy 'camping' - Jurassic Park III Reviews

"No force on Heaven or Earth could ever make me go back to Isla Sorna," Sam Neill declares at the beginning of the third film in the JURASSIC PARK trilogy. That, of course, is the Hollywood code for, 'Within 15 to 20 minutes, I will be on the Island, knee-deep in dinosaur dung, with my sleeves rolled up in the plot of this movie' (looking for a young boy, played by Trevor Morgan, who disappeared on the island). Reluctant heroes are usually crowd-pleasers. The island, a hell for the humans who end up stranded on it (Neill and a band of would-be rescuers led by William H. Macy and T?Leoni), is a haven for legions of dinosaurs who escaped destruction in the first two JURASSIC PARK movies. These include the ever hungry -- and, now, smarter -- velociraptors; the massive spinosaurus, which dwarves, and elbows out, tyrannosaurus, for screen time; and the alluring, airborne pteranodons (which audiences are likely to mistake for the more popular pterodactyls). The unhappy troop of castaways runs through a maze of dinosaur encounters, with lots of jolts, but little danger when all is said and done. The thrills here are darker, as in a scene where the group makes a gruesome discovery about the missing boy's landing on the island. But, as it turns out, this has little to do with dinosaurs. With its mix of chills and special effects eye-fills, JURASSIC PARK is standard fare, totally passable summer entertainment. But, it's not much more than that. From the way the dinosaurs are sent galloping across the screen, without having to establish anything by way of premise or having to convince us of it, to the easy use of familiar themes like "the reluctant hero," one gets the sense that JURASSIC PARK III isn't really trying. The densely vegetated setting adds darkness to many scenes, and a pretext not do the amazing things the first two movies did with shadows and nuances of texture for stunning visual accomplishment. The establishing scenes, in which the Sam Neill character gives speeches about his theory of velociraptor communications are clearly put there solely to explain to us some of the scenes that will come later, and hardly advance any other strand of storyline related to his character -- and, the same can be said for many other things that happen in the movie. This is the 'Old Professor' trick from second rate horror movies, where one of the characters is an expert on a subject, just so he could have a couple of lines that will explain something that would be too much work to actually have to *show* us. A good cast helps a lot, though. Here, character actors William H. Macy and Michael Jeter, who some may remember as the homeless cabaret singer from THE FISHER KING (1991), back up Sam Neill when the forest canopy of a script threatens to collapse around them. (Carlos Colorado)

The series is redeemed! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

After a pathetic sequel in the Lost World, Jurassic Park III redeems the series exactly how it should..........relentless action. While the plot may not be grade A material, it is sufficient enough to enjoy this movie and see the Dinos and Alan Grant back in action. Superb acting carries the movie during its few light moments, and Joe Johnson's great vision carries it the rest of the way. It was not as good as the original, but it is definitely a rip-roaring ride through the depths of Isla Sorna.

Jurassic park iii, there back! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Jurassic Park, the first of the trilogy, not directed by Sir. Speilberge. But Joe Johnston, didn't do that bad of a job. Although, I did find the story to be a little un-believable, and Although I am a big fan of the new guy on the block (Spinosaurus), after watching the first two again, I realize, that the Jurassic Park movies, aren't the same without it's fiersome predator, the T-rex. It's a great movie, you'll wanna see it again and again, I give it a "A-"

"f"s all across the board - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Jurassic Park is my all-time favorite movie. When I was three, it was released. I'd watch it over and over, especially the closing scene with the Tyrannosaurus. The Lost World was also good, so when I saw a trailer for Jurassic Park III, I was thrilled. I went to the theater. JP3 did a horrible job in about every movie-related category that one can think of. The acting sucks, (especially the kid, Grant was the only good one,) the '93 dinosaurs look MUCH BETTER than the '01 dinosaurs. The story is so highly improbable, the dinosaurs display inaccurate behavior, the T-Rex dies, the actors effortlessly find solutions to problems that would take up a good spot in the plot in the previous films, and the ending, mmm... the Army and Navy coming to rescue these five people off of a dinosaur inhabited island due to the call of one woman, who thought of that? And how can Alan talk to raptors? True, the raptors door opening was cool in the first movie, but the socializing, trap-setting and other crap was a bit farfetched. Overall, the movie was F-quality. There are kiddie pools deeper than every element of this sad, franchise-hurting installment.

They just keep getting worse and worse - Jurassic Park III Reviews

The worst Jurrasic Park film yet, i mean its still watchable, and its worth watching, but not more then once. Sam Neils a Okay actor i ges. but all the others are mediocre.

The worst film i have seen! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Please, do not waste your time watching this! This is one of the shortest and most predictable films i have ever seen. If you've seen the original Jurassic park then there i no need to see this, it is simply more of the same. CGI effects may have seemed spectacular 10 years ago but this film offers nothing new and the special effects are a pitiful attempt to mask the fact the this movie is nothing but a cash-in!They do not make up for the fact that this film is missing a storyline. I am very glad i did not pay money to see this at the cinema! You have been warned!

Yawn! oh sorry....were you watching that...movie! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Yawn! Sigh! Yawn! Cough! Cough! Sorry, you weren't trying to watch that were you? This is a quote spun off from my lips seconds after watching this ''Movie'' is that what you call it thses days? It doesn't deserve to be called a movie! What a pathetic excuse for Steven Speilburg, it makes this movie annoy me with a passion! It would give me an excuse to switch channels and watch ''Voyager'' All together now ''What a load of junk'la la la la la, What a big load of junk'' la la la la la'' Im gonna be sick, I can't imagen why this was ever given permission to allow our eyes to watch such a poor amount of junk. We now all need perscription glasses, labeled unsuitable for viewing rubbish movies. Not fit to lie in my dustbin! Cough Cough!

Jurassic park iii is bestest film - Jurassic Park III Reviews

The one movie on video is Jurassic Park III since two films: Jurassic Park and The Lost World, but the third film of the Jurassic Park trilogy is the visual effects on the full motion on the dinosaurs.

Do not waste your time! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

The people who made this were extremely bored and digging too deep to create yet ANOTHER movie about dinosaurs. It was so pathetic, I know no one whose seen it all the way through.

Jurassica park iii yay - Jurassic Park III Reviews

this movie blows the first two were way better dont see this movie you will be disappoiinted if you liked the first two

This flim is deader then dead - Jurassic Park III Reviews

The Dinos Where Cool But The Story Sucked It Was Nothing Like The Other Jurassic PArk Flims And It Wasnt Even From Any Of The Books Infact It Was Boreing And Corney The 2nd Flim Is Better Then This.

A very good movie! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

The acting? Very nice. I liked it alot. The direction was even better. The visuals were incredible. But the story is where I had a problem. The other movies had so much more of a story, so much deeper. But this does enough to get an A+, and is in my Top 10 Favorite movies of all time, along with Jurassic Park 1 and 2. :-)

The last jp just killed the trilogy - Jurassic Park III Reviews

The most mediocre story, of a boy that survived 3 months alone in an island filled with carnivorous dinosaurs? a doctor that doesn't have experience talking to dinosaurs but already becomes an expert at the end and saves everyone, and typical... only the stars survive and the secondary characters always die, the way the stars survive are pretty un-imaginative, and this simple story just made the JP extinct. FAr different from the original Jurrasic park, where the story was filled with tension , a new look at computer animation , the angles of photography are great for the movie, suspense , great storyline, great direciton from Steven Spielberg, and a great ending. Instead , in JP3 it's just a horrible story , but what's funny , is that the marines come at the end to save everyone ! lol.

Best jurrassic park ever - Jurassic Park III Reviews

1993 , the first one came out (but as second best.) The second one was the worst .Then the best one came out which is the third one.

Horrible and a down right disgrace. - Jurassic Park III Reviews

I don?t know why they made this film, but this was truly disgraceful. There is nothing going for this blunder other than ripping off the Jurassic Park name. Sam Neil should have read the script before he made a fool of himself here, and the special effects are not up to caliber with the other movies in the series.

The ultimate jurassic park movie - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Jurassic Park 3 is better then the first 2 films. Only this time, it returns to Dr. Alan Grant, now searching for research about velociraptors. While researching, he's asked by a traveling couple who love to travel and want an aerial tour of Isla Sorna, the second island filled with dinosaurs. He disagrees to take them, but money changes his mind and soon he, the traveling couple, his colleague, and 4 crew men head to the island by airplane in hopes of seeing great things. Instead, they end up crashing on the dinosaur infested island after a monstrous spinosaurus causes them to crash. Now they fight to survive the monstrous beasts as they try to eat them. Not only that, the traveling couple are actually on the island for another reason, to search for there missing son who is on the island somewhere. The greatest scenes in this film is the non-stop running, screaming, jumping across large gaps, killing the dinosuars, the terrifying, yet action packed filled airplane crash, as well as the huge boat explosion and the large fog-filled birdcage, filled with dozens of pterodactyls. Jurassic Park 3 is brilliant and exciting to the end the trilogy. But now they're making Jurassic Park 4.

Absolute crap - Jurassic Park III Reviews

In brief, every part of this movie blows. It's a disgrace to the first movie. The effects, story, writing, visuals, characters, scenes, fights, and anything else that makes this excuse for a movie is poor, silly, cartoony, ineffective, uninspired, weak, and dumb. I love the original movie, and this is a disgrace to that film. If you love the first one, spare yourself the pain of seeing this wretched, offensive tripe. The guy who made this and Jumanji should never be allowed to direct another movie. I don't like The Lost World, either, but this is just so cheap and empty that it's sad. The only quality this movie may have is that some of it is so bad it's funny (for example, Grant telling people that if they'd survived, raptors would have become the dominant species instead of humans), but for me the movie is too painful to watch.