Yuck - Jurassic Park III Reviews

This is the worst movie i have ever seen, its like watching #1 and #2 all over again. It was a waste of my time and money.

Just so damn worthless - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Jurassic Park has always been a movie about dinosaurs. THe bad thing? Always just the same happens. THe characters just got stranded in an island worth of dinosaurs and then stupid disasters happen. You know, it always come to disasters and yes of course the main characters survive. MOreover good dinosaurs always appear in the end. Is there any other stories you could make besides this stupid and truly used up concept?

Could've been better! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

I like Jurassic Park movies and I loved this one two, but I wish it could've lived up to its predecessers. It was a good movie but could've had been payed more work on top of it.

Too short - Jurassic Park III Reviews

This movie is not even close to being as good as the first two. It's too short, the bodycount is too low, and the spinosaurus looks fake. The only good part is when the T-Rex and the spinosaurus fight. And they completely killed the way people view the Tyrannosaurus by having it lose to the stupid looking main dinosaur. I also liked the raptors.

Happy 'camping' - Jurassic Park III Reviews

"No force on Heaven or Earth could ever make me go back to Isla Sorna," Sam Neill declares at the beginning of the third film in the JURASSIC PARK trilogy. That, of course, is the Hollywood code for, 'Within 15 to 20 minutes, I will be on the Island, knee-deep in dinosaur dung, with my sleeves rolled up in the plot of this movie' (looking for a young boy, played by Trevor Morgan, who disappeared on the island). Reluctant heroes are usually crowd-pleasers. The island, a hell for the humans who end up stranded on it (Neill and a band of would-be rescuers led by William H. Macy and T?Leoni), is a haven for legions of dinosaurs who escaped destruction in the first two JURASSIC PARK movies. These include the ever hungry -- and, now, smarter -- velociraptors; the massive spinosaurus, which dwarves, and elbows out, tyrannosaurus, for screen time; and the alluring, airborne pteranodons (which audiences are likely to mistake for the more popular pterodactyls). The unhappy troop of castaways runs through a maze of dinosaur encounters, with lots of jolts, but little danger when all is said and done. The thrills here are darker, as in a scene where the group makes a gruesome discovery about the missing boy's landing on the island. But, as it turns out, this has little to do with dinosaurs. With its mix of chills and special effects eye-fills, JURASSIC PARK is standard fare, totally passable summer entertainment. But, it's not much more than that. From the way the dinosaurs are sent galloping across the screen, without having to establish anything by way of premise or having to convince us of it, to the easy use of familiar themes like "the reluctant hero," one gets the sense that JURASSIC PARK III isn't really trying. The densely vegetated setting adds darkness to many scenes, and a pretext not do the amazing things the first two movies did with shadows and nuances of texture for stunning visual accomplishment. The establishing scenes, in which the Sam Neill character gives speeches about his theory of velociraptor communications are clearly put there solely to explain to us some of the scenes that will come later, and hardly advance any other strand of storyline related to his character -- and, the same can be said for many other things that happen in the movie. This is the 'Old Professor' trick from second rate horror movies, where one of the characters is an expert on a subject, just so he could have a couple of lines that will explain something that would be too much work to actually have to *show* us. A good cast helps a lot, though. Here, character actors William H. Macy and Michael Jeter, who some may remember as the homeless cabaret singer from THE FISHER KING (1991), back up Sam Neill when the forest canopy of a script threatens to collapse around them. (Carlos Colorado)

The series is redeemed! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

After a pathetic sequel in the Lost World, Jurassic Park III redeems the series exactly how it should..........relentless action. While the plot may not be grade A material, it is sufficient enough to enjoy this movie and see the Dinos and Alan Grant back in action. Superb acting carries the movie during its few light moments, and Joe Johnson's great vision carries it the rest of the way. It was not as good as the original, but it is definitely a rip-roaring ride through the depths of Isla Sorna.

Jurassic park iii, there back! - Jurassic Park III Reviews

Jurassic Park, the first of the trilogy, not directed by Sir. Speilberge. But Joe Johnston, didn't do that bad of a job. Although, I did find the story to be a little un-believable, and Although I am a big fan of the new guy on the block (Spinosaurus), after watching the first two again, I realize, that the Jurassic Park movies, aren't the same without it's fiersome predator, the T-rex. It's a great movie, you'll wanna see it again and again, I give it a "A-"